Feedback from Bulldozer

Hey y'all -- First of all great show and thank you for getting this info out to the likes of people like me.  Now I realize that I am not the sharpest pencil in the box and the answer to my question may well be self explanatory to most but I still must ask none the less. This week as I have listened to your shows on money something is striking me hard...

Hey y'all -- First of all great show and thank you for getting this info out to the likes of people like me.  Now I realize that I am not the sharpest pencil in the box and the answer to my question may well be self explanatory to most but I still must ask none the less.  This week as I have listened to your shows on money something is striking me hard.

Now if as you say that the coinage act of 1792 defines the monetary unit known as a dollar as being equal to 371 grains of pure silver and has never been removed from the books, what then is to stop me from taking say 2000 dollars to the Federal Reserve and demanding them to redeem them for the gold or silver they are worth?  Now yes more than likely they will reject such a claim and tell me that we are no longer on the gold standard.  After the rejection and armed with the knowledge that the Federal Reserve is illegal in the first place and that the piece of paper in hand still has the word dollar on it: well why then not take them to court and demand my exchange?  The fact that they did not change the note name from dollar after very clearly being defined in terms of silver for the lowly dollar and defined in terms of gold for the larger denominations seems to put them in a bind from a legal stand point to have to make good on the note.  We then would not be the ones in debt to these world banker jerks but it would be they that are in debt to us.

They should have called the paper the 1 green back bill but again the did not and I would say that puts them in a legal bind to make good on it's defined worth.  Once again I may just be missing something but why not?

Bulldozer